InTheValueGap,ToniR繪nnow-Rasmussenaddressesthedistinctionbetweenwhatisfinallygoodandwhatisfinallygood-for,twovaluenotionsthatarecentraltoethicsandpracticaldeliberation.Thefirstpartofthebookarguesagainstviewsthatclaimthatoneofthesenotionsiseitherfaulty,oratbestconceptuallydependentontheothernotion.Whereasthesetwoviewsdisagreeonwhetheritisgoodorgood-forthatistheflawedordependentconcept,itisargued,asagainstbothapproaches,thatgoodnessandgoodness-forareindependentvaluenotionsthatcannotbefullyunderstoodintermsofoneanother.Thesecondpartprovidesananalysisofgoodandgood-forintermsofafitting-attitudeanalysis.Byelaboratingamorenuancedunderstandingofthekeyelementsofthisanalysis--reasonsandpro-attitudes--R繪nnow-Rasmussenchallengesthewidespreadideathattherearenogenuinepracticalandmoraldilemmas.Theresultisthatthegapbetweenfavouringforareasonwhatisgoodandfavouringforareasonwhatisgoodforsomeoneappearsinsurmountable.
